Are all variables the same?

Does every variable serve the same purpose?

When you think about it, you’ll see that the answer is “no.” Variables serve different purposes. When we explain this to students, we help them understand how variables work. Explaining this helps students understand how algebra “works.” You’ll see what I mean in a moment.

Consider the famous slope-intercept equation: y = mx + b

A student recently asked me: Are the x and y variables the same as the m and b variables? What a great opportunity to explain something important!

I explained that the x and y variables serve completely different purposes than the m and b variables. Here’s how.

The variables m and b are what I call “identifier” variables. By which I mean that they help us identify a specific line. To explain that, I asked the student a set of questions about something everyone understands — home addresses.

What would happen, I asked, if someone wanted to know where I live, and I told him that I live at 942? The student replied that this would not be enough info.

Then I asked, what if I told this person only that I live on Vuelta del Sur (a street name where I live in Santa Fe, NM)? Again the student said that this would not be enough info.

But what if I told this person that I live at 942 Vuelta del Sur. This, the student realized, would be enough information to enable someone to find my house. (All they have to do is Google me, and they’ll have my house AND directions!)

I pointed out that a similar situation applies to lines.

If I have a specific line in mind, and I want someone else to know the line I’m thinking of, is it enough to give this person just the line’s slope? No, for it could be any line with this slope, of which there are infinitely many parallel lines. What if I don’t give the slope but I do give the line’s y-intercept? Still not enough, as there are infinitely many lines that run through this y-intercept. But what if I tell the person both the slope and the y-intercept. Aha! The student could see — through drawings I made of this situation on a coordinate plane — that when you provide both slope and the y-intercept, there is one and only one line that could be indicated.

I explained that variables like m and b, which help identify a specific line, are “identifier” variables; their job is to identify a specific line. If your students are more advanced, you can explain that there are other identifier variables in different kinds of equations. For example, in the equation of a parabola: y – k = a(x – h)^2, the identifier variables would be the variables a, h, and k.

But what about variables like x and y? What do they do? What is their purpose?

These variables, I explained, have a completely different purpose. I call variables like x and y “ordered-pair generators.”

To explain this, I show students a simple linear equation like y = 2x, and demonstrate how, using a “T-table,” you can use this equation to generate as many ordered pairs as you’d like, ordered pairs like (0,0), (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), etc. Point out that you can keep going and going. And then explain that the purpose of the x and y variables is to generate the infinitely many points that make up the line.

So the m and b variables tell us where the line is, and the x and y variables allow us to find the infinitely many actual points on the line. The two sets of variables, while different in purpose, work together toward a common goal: to give us the equation of a line.

There are other purposes that variables serve, of course. And I’ll probably describe some of the other purposes in future posts. But the main point is that it helps students to recognize that variables do serve different purposes. Armed with that understanding, they can make much more sense of algebra’s formulas and equations.

Comments on:"Not all variables are created equal" (3)Chris Marksaid:I see where you’re coming from, but m and b aren’t really variables. They’re undetermined constants.

joshturtlesaid:That’s an interesting term. I can’t say I’ve seen it used in standard secondary textbooks, but the term makes sense.

joshturtlesaid:Kim, Interesting comment. Based on what you are saying, I wonder what would you call x in an equation like x + 3 = 11. Is x an unknown in that situation, or a variable? Based on what you are saying, it would seem that here, too, x would be an unknown, not a variable, since there is one value that x is equal to. And it would follow that in any single equation with one letter, where the letter can be solved for one (or two, in the case of roots) value(s), the letter would be called an “unknown,” not a variable. [like 7x + 2 = 16 (x = 7), or x^2 = 9 (x = – 3, 3] And more generally, in any system of equations where the number of letters equals the number of equations, then the letters would have to be called unknowns, not variables, because there is a single solution for those letters. And also, in an inequality, like x is greater than or equal to 2, there are solutions for x, so is x an unknown in this situation, or a variable? Where do you draw the line? Does the letter have to be capable of assuming every real number value in order for it to be called a “variable”?